This episode explains the RIDDOR 2013 regulations, highlighting employer responsibilities, reporting timelines, and record-keeping requirements. Featuring real-world case studies and insights into modern compliance challenges, it underscores the importance of workplace safety and transparency. Learn how these regulations continue to adapt to modern workplaces, including remote work scenarios.
Sarah
Okay, so today we're diving into something that's crucial for workplace safety but, honestly, it might sound a bit dry at firstâ
Sarah
RIDDOR 2013. I I promise, though, we'll make it interesting!
Eric
RIDDOR, which stands for Reporting of Injuries, Diseases, and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations, replaced the earlier 1995 version. It came into effect in October 2013, and it plays a vital role in workplace safety.
Sarah
Right, and it's based on the Health and Safety at Work Act from 1974, isn't it?
Eric
Exactly. That act is the backbone of health and safety law in the UK, and RIDDOR strengthens it by requiring employers to formally report certain types of workplace incidents.
Sarah
You know, when you put it that way, it sounds pretty straightforward. Butâand here's the kickerâthere are a ton of specific terms in this regulation. Like, what were the ones? âResponsible personâ... uh, "reportable incident" and "dangerous occurrence," right?
Eric
Correct. Let's start with âresponsible person.â This refers to the employer, typically, though in some cases it could be someone in control of the workplace. Then there's âreportable incident,â which includes workplace accidents that lead to specific injuries, or worse, fatalities.
Sarah
And then âdangerous occurrencesâ are like near misses, aren't they? Stuff that could have caused serious harm but didn't?
Eric
Exactly. Things like the collapse of scaffolding, or certain types of equipment failures. These scenarios, even when no one is hurt, have to be reported because they highlight potential risks in the workplace.
Sarah
Right, and itâs this proactive approach that really stands out to me. Can I share a quick story?
Eric
Of course.
Sarah
So, I used to have this summer job where health and safety felt more like a box-ticking exercise. One day, a colleague slipped on a wet floor and, thankfully, wasnât too hurt, but it turned out the sign marking the wet floor had been missing all morning. That couldâve been much worse.
Eric
Ah, a classic example of how easily things can escalate if hazards arenât properly managed or reported.
Sarah
Totally. And situations like that really underline why regulations like RIDDOR are so critical.
Eric
Absolutely. Itâs about spotting patterns, learning from these incidents, and, ultimately, preventing future accidents.
Sarah
And the definitions and terms we just talked about are the foundation for all of it. If you know those, understanding the rest becomes so much simpler.
Sarah
Now that weâve clarified those key terms, letâs build on that foundation and get into the practical sideâwhat RIDDOR actually expects from employers or, as weâve termed them, âresponsible persons.â
Eric
Right. One of the main obligations is reporting specific incidents. For example, if a worker suffers an injury that requires a hospital visit or causes them to miss work for more than seven days, itâs not just importantâitâs mandatory to report that. And thereâs a strict timeline: the report must be submitted within 15 days of the incident.
Sarah
Fifteen days? Thatâs not long. I mean, if youâre juggling other tasks, I can see how that might easily slip by. But the point isâ
Sarah
âyou canât let it. Youâve gotta stay on top of these things!
Eric
Exactly. And the regulation is clear for good reason. Reporting isnât just a legal requirement; it creates accountability and helps identify risks that might be invisible at first glance.
Sarah
I get that. So, those seven-consecutive-days injuries are one category. But what about more serious stuff? Fatalities, for instance?
Eric
Work-related fatalities must be reported immediatelyâliterally without delay. And then there are âdangerous occurrences,â which we touched on earlier. These include situations such as scaffolding collapses, electrical failures causing fires, or even incidents involving lifting equipment breaking under load.
Sarah
Oh, and those are listed in Schedule 2 of the regulation, right? There's a whole inventory of what counts as a dangerous occurrence.
Eric
Spot on. For instance, imagine a lifting crane malfunctioning, or even something like an unintentional gas leakâthese are categorized as dangerous because they pose severe risks, even if no one gets hurt.
Sarah
Yeah, and that "no one gets hurt" bit is keyâitâs about prevention, isnât it? Reporting these near-misses kind of sounds like a safety crystal ball. Proactively catching issues before they lead to harm.
Eric
Thatâs exactly the logic. Now, hereâs an interesting point: letâs think about incidents in quarries or offshore sites. These are highly regulated environments, and RIDDOR plays an essential role in maintaining safety there. By addressing dangerous occurrences at even these extreme workplaces, it sets the tone for safety across all industries.
Sarah
And speaking of real-world scenarios, letâs think outside the manual. Ever heard about that industrial accident where a worker was rescued after a scaffolding collapse? Because the company followed RIDDOR guidelines to the letter, investigators quickly found the issue and updated safety measures company-wide. That transparency probably saved lives later on.
Eric
Great example. It also demonstrates how compliance can protect both employees and the organization itself from future risks.
Sarah
Yeah, and itâs really about seeing the bigger pictureâyouâre not just ticking a box, youâre securing your workplace.
Eric
Exactly. Each report becomes part of a broader ecosystem of safety data, helping the Health and Safety Executive identify widespread trends and solve systemic issues.
Sarah
Alright, so building on what weâve discussed about reporting and compliance, letâs dive into another crucial piece: maintaining records. It might not sound glamorous, but without proper records, youâd be putting complianceâand workplace safetyâat risk. What should employers and responsible persons keep in mind here?
Eric
It can feel that way, but itâs actually quite manageable if you stay organized. Under RIDDOR, a responsible person must maintain records of any reportable incidents for at least three years. This is crucial, not just for compliance, but for audits and, sometimes, legal cases.
Sarah
Three yearsâI can see why. Itâs like a safety net, isnât it? Letâs say thereâs some ambiguity later on, you've got evidence ready to go. But what happens if records aren't kept?
Eric
Well, not keeping records can lead to penalties. And beyond that, you risk losing valuable data that could prevent other incidents. Itâs about more than ticking boxesâitâs safeguarding your operations and people.
Sarah
Hah, so it's like a safety diary for the workplace. Got it. And then thereâs the review requirement, right?
Eric
Exactly. The Secretary of State is required to review these regulations every five years. This review ensures that RIDDOR remains relevant, taking into account changes in industries, technologies, and even working conditions.
Sarah
Yeah, especially with remote working becoming more common. Imagine trying to track an incident for someone working from home. Thereâs got to be nuances there, right?
Eric
Absolutely, and thatâs where these periodic reviews are valuable. They allow for updates to address emerging challenges like remote work, or even activities conducted outside Great Britain under the 2013 Order.
Sarah
Wait, outside Great Britain? I didnât even think of that. So, these rules donât just apply to offices in, say, London or Manchester?
Eric
No, they extend to certain workplaces overseas where British companies operate, especially in offshore sectors. Itâs a nod to the global nature of business today.
Sarah
That's fascinating. And it really makes you thinkâhow would remote or international setups organise compliance remotely?
Eric
It can be complex, but technology plays a big part. Tools for digital reporting and cloud storage are making it easier to ensure compliance across borders. But itâs also up to legislation to keep up with these changes.
Sarah
You know, I think itâs really down to adapting, isnât it? Regulations like RIDDOR give us the framework, but how we apply it is always evolving.
Eric
Exactly. And on that note, compliance isnât the end goalâitâs a step toward creating safer and more accountable work environments.
Sarah
Couldnât agree more. So, listeners, whether youâre keeping records, adapting to remote setups, or just learning the ropes, know thisâRIDDOR is here to help, not hinder.
Eric
And that's all for today. Thanks for joining us to unpack this crucial topic.
Sarah
Stay safe, stay compliant, and weâll catch you next time.
Chapters (3)
About the podcast
This is a set of Podcast's looking into different important legislations that you need to be aware of to ensure you are following these agreed ways of working in your job role.
This podcast is brought to you by Jellypod, Inc.
© 2025 All rights reserved.