Legislations Legislations

Understanding RIDDOR and Workplace Safety Responsibilities

This episode explains the RIDDOR 2013 regulations, highlighting employer responsibilities, reporting timelines, and record-keeping requirements. Featuring real-world case studies and insights into modern compliance challenges, it underscores the importance of workplace safety and transparency. Learn how these regulations continue to adapt to modern workplaces, including remote work scenarios.

Published OnApril 28, 2025
Chapter 1

Understanding RIDDOR 2013

Sarah

Okay, so today we're diving into something that's crucial for workplace safety but, honestly, it might sound a bit dry at first—

Sarah

RIDDOR 2013. I I promise, though, we'll make it interesting!

Eric

RIDDOR, which stands for Reporting of Injuries, Diseases, and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations, replaced the earlier 1995 version. It came into effect in October 2013, and it plays a vital role in workplace safety.

Sarah

Right, and it's based on the Health and Safety at Work Act from 1974, isn't it?

Eric

Exactly. That act is the backbone of health and safety law in the UK, and RIDDOR strengthens it by requiring employers to formally report certain types of workplace incidents.

Sarah

You know, when you put it that way, it sounds pretty straightforward. But—and here's the kicker—there are a ton of specific terms in this regulation. Like, what were the ones? “Responsible person”... uh, "reportable incident" and "dangerous occurrence," right?

Eric

Correct. Let's start with “responsible person.” This refers to the employer, typically, though in some cases it could be someone in control of the workplace. Then there's “reportable incident,” which includes workplace accidents that lead to specific injuries, or worse, fatalities.

Sarah

And then “dangerous occurrences” are like near misses, aren't they? Stuff that could have caused serious harm but didn't?

Eric

Exactly. Things like the collapse of scaffolding, or certain types of equipment failures. These scenarios, even when no one is hurt, have to be reported because they highlight potential risks in the workplace.

Sarah

Right, and it’s this proactive approach that really stands out to me. Can I share a quick story?

Eric

Of course.

Sarah

So, I used to have this summer job where health and safety felt more like a box-ticking exercise. One day, a colleague slipped on a wet floor and, thankfully, wasn’t too hurt, but it turned out the sign marking the wet floor had been missing all morning. That could’ve been much worse.

Eric

Ah, a classic example of how easily things can escalate if hazards aren’t properly managed or reported.

Sarah

Totally. And situations like that really underline why regulations like RIDDOR are so critical.

Eric

Absolutely. It’s about spotting patterns, learning from these incidents, and, ultimately, preventing future accidents.

Sarah

And the definitions and terms we just talked about are the foundation for all of it. If you know those, understanding the rest becomes so much simpler.

Chapter 2

Employer Responsibilities and Reporting Guidelines

Sarah

Now that we’ve clarified those key terms, let’s build on that foundation and get into the practical side—what RIDDOR actually expects from employers or, as we’ve termed them, “responsible persons.”

Eric

Right. One of the main obligations is reporting specific incidents. For example, if a worker suffers an injury that requires a hospital visit or causes them to miss work for more than seven days, it’s not just important—it’s mandatory to report that. And there’s a strict timeline: the report must be submitted within 15 days of the incident.

Sarah

Fifteen days? That’s not long. I mean, if you’re juggling other tasks, I can see how that might easily slip by. But the point is—

Sarah

—you can’t let it. You’ve gotta stay on top of these things!

Eric

Exactly. And the regulation is clear for good reason. Reporting isn’t just a legal requirement; it creates accountability and helps identify risks that might be invisible at first glance.

Sarah

I get that. So, those seven-consecutive-days injuries are one category. But what about more serious stuff? Fatalities, for instance?

Eric

Work-related fatalities must be reported immediately—literally without delay. And then there are “dangerous occurrences,” which we touched on earlier. These include situations such as scaffolding collapses, electrical failures causing fires, or even incidents involving lifting equipment breaking under load.

Sarah

Oh, and those are listed in Schedule 2 of the regulation, right? There's a whole inventory of what counts as a dangerous occurrence.

Eric

Spot on. For instance, imagine a lifting crane malfunctioning, or even something like an unintentional gas leak—these are categorized as dangerous because they pose severe risks, even if no one gets hurt.

Sarah

Yeah, and that "no one gets hurt" bit is key—it’s about prevention, isn’t it? Reporting these near-misses kind of sounds like a safety crystal ball. Proactively catching issues before they lead to harm.

Eric

That’s exactly the logic. Now, here’s an interesting point: let’s think about incidents in quarries or offshore sites. These are highly regulated environments, and RIDDOR plays an essential role in maintaining safety there. By addressing dangerous occurrences at even these extreme workplaces, it sets the tone for safety across all industries.

Sarah

And speaking of real-world scenarios, let’s think outside the manual. Ever heard about that industrial accident where a worker was rescued after a scaffolding collapse? Because the company followed RIDDOR guidelines to the letter, investigators quickly found the issue and updated safety measures company-wide. That transparency probably saved lives later on.

Eric

Great example. It also demonstrates how compliance can protect both employees and the organization itself from future risks.

Sarah

Yeah, and it’s really about seeing the bigger picture—you’re not just ticking a box, you’re securing your workplace.

Eric

Exactly. Each report becomes part of a broader ecosystem of safety data, helping the Health and Safety Executive identify widespread trends and solve systemic issues.

Chapter 3

Maintaining Records and Ensuring Compliance

Sarah

Alright, so building on what we’ve discussed about reporting and compliance, let’s dive into another crucial piece: maintaining records. It might not sound glamorous, but without proper records, you’d be putting compliance—and workplace safety—at risk. What should employers and responsible persons keep in mind here?

Eric

It can feel that way, but it’s actually quite manageable if you stay organized. Under RIDDOR, a responsible person must maintain records of any reportable incidents for at least three years. This is crucial, not just for compliance, but for audits and, sometimes, legal cases.

Sarah

Three years—I can see why. It’s like a safety net, isn’t it? Let’s say there’s some ambiguity later on, you've got evidence ready to go. But what happens if records aren't kept?

Eric

Well, not keeping records can lead to penalties. And beyond that, you risk losing valuable data that could prevent other incidents. It’s about more than ticking boxes—it’s safeguarding your operations and people.

Sarah

Hah, so it's like a safety diary for the workplace. Got it. And then there’s the review requirement, right?

Eric

Exactly. The Secretary of State is required to review these regulations every five years. This review ensures that RIDDOR remains relevant, taking into account changes in industries, technologies, and even working conditions.

Sarah

Yeah, especially with remote working becoming more common. Imagine trying to track an incident for someone working from home. There’s got to be nuances there, right?

Eric

Absolutely, and that’s where these periodic reviews are valuable. They allow for updates to address emerging challenges like remote work, or even activities conducted outside Great Britain under the 2013 Order.

Sarah

Wait, outside Great Britain? I didn’t even think of that. So, these rules don’t just apply to offices in, say, London or Manchester?

Eric

No, they extend to certain workplaces overseas where British companies operate, especially in offshore sectors. It’s a nod to the global nature of business today.

Sarah

That's fascinating. And it really makes you think—how would remote or international setups organise compliance remotely?

Eric

It can be complex, but technology plays a big part. Tools for digital reporting and cloud storage are making it easier to ensure compliance across borders. But it’s also up to legislation to keep up with these changes.

Sarah

You know, I think it’s really down to adapting, isn’t it? Regulations like RIDDOR give us the framework, but how we apply it is always evolving.

Eric

Exactly. And on that note, compliance isn’t the end goal—it’s a step toward creating safer and more accountable work environments.

Sarah

Couldn’t agree more. So, listeners, whether you’re keeping records, adapting to remote setups, or just learning the ropes, know this—RIDDOR is here to help, not hinder.

Eric

And that's all for today. Thanks for joining us to unpack this crucial topic.

Sarah

Stay safe, stay compliant, and we’ll catch you next time.

About the podcast

This is a set of Podcast's looking into different important legislations that you need to be aware of to ensure you are following these agreed ways of working in your job role.

This podcast is brought to you by Jellypod, Inc.

© 2025 All rights reserved.